If the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only accomplished In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence plus the petitioner company responded to the allegations as a result they were well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
However, decisions rendered from the Supreme Court in the United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues in the Constitution and federal legislation.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of latest opinions The cases listed below have had opinions filed for them within the final fourteen times. The following information is available for Each and every case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, such as signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
This is because transfer orders are typically considered within the administrative discretion from the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is enthusiastic by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more
Given that the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be reached, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
From the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court would be the highest court inside the United States. Decreased courts around the federal level consist of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, as well as the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related into the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that entail parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Every single state has its very own judicial system that consists of trial and appellate courts. The highest court in each state is commonly referred to because the “supreme” court, although there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the Ny Court of Appeals or perhaps the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state law and regulations, Whilst state courts could also generally listen to cases involving federal laws.
If you find an error within the material of the published opinion (for instance a misspelled name or maybe a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
Only the written opinions in the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals are routinely available. Decisions on the reduce (trial) courts are usually not generally published or distributed.
Are you currently looking for Court Information? You can use our site to search for your case or search for your person. Information about the site is updated every 24 hrs at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found to the search site is provided to be used as reference material and is not the official court record.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension can be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set from the government.
Problems or Errors For those who encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a lousy link or maybe a portion of the opinion missing), please notify the eService Center.
Previous four tax years interpreted. It's not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble click here Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is usually a well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.